Non-consensual deepfake videos, that humiliate and demean women,
are racking up millions of views on mainstream porn sites. Nothing
is being done about them
Non-consensual pornographic deepfakes almost exclusively target
women
Hundreds of explicit deepfake videos featuring female
celebrities, actresses and musicians are being uploaded to the
world’s biggest pornography websites every month, new analysis
shows. The non-consensual videos rack up millions of views and porn
companies are still failing to remove them from their websites.
Up to 1,000 deepfake videos have been uploaded to porn sites
every month as they became increasingly popular during 2020,
figures from deepfake detection company Sensity show. The videos
continue to break away from dedicated deepfake pornography
communities and into the mainstream.
Deepfake videos hosted on three of the biggest porn websites,
XVideos, Xnxx, and xHamster, have been viewed millions of times.
The videos are surrounded by adverts, helping to make money for the
sites. XVideos and Xnxx, which are both owned by the same Czech
holding company, are the number one and three biggest porn websites
in world and rank in the top ten biggest sites across the entire
web. They each have, or exceed, as many visitors as Wikipedia,
Amazon and Reddit.
One 30-second video, which appears on all three of the above
sites and uses actress Emma Watson’s face, has been viewed more
than 23 million times – being watched 13m times on Xnxx. Other
deepfake videos, which have hundreds of thousands or millions of
views, include celebrities such as Natalie Portman, Billie Eilish,
Taylor Swift and Indian actress Anushka Shetty. Many of the
celebrities have continuously been the targets of deepfakes since
they first emerged in 2018.
By Matt Burgess
“The attitude of these websites is that they don’t really
consider this a problem,” says Giorgio Patrini, CEO and chief
scientist at Sensity, which was until recently called DeepTrace.
Deepfake pornography videos are widely considered to target, harm,
and humiliate the women that are placed at their core. Patrini adds
that Sensity has increasingly seen deepfakes being made for other
people in the public realm, such as Instagram, Twitch and YouTube
influencers, and worries the advancement of deepfake tech will
inevitably see members of the public targeted.
“Until there is a strong reason for them [porn websites] to try
to take them down and to filter them, I strongly believe nothing is
going to happen,” Patrini says. “People will still be free to
upload this type of material without any consequences to these
websites that are viewed by hundreds of millions of people”.
Many of the videos are hiding in plain sight – they’re uploaded
to be watched, after all. Some videos include “fake” or “deepfake”
in their titles and are tagged as being a deepfake. For instance,
tag pages on XVideos and Xnxx list hundreds of the videos.
However, the full scale of the problem on porn websites is
unknown. There will probably never be a true picture of how many of
these videos are created without people’s permission.
Despite repeated attempts to contact representatives of XVideos
and Xnxx, the owners did not answer requests for comment on their
attitudes and policies towards deepfakes.
Alex Hawkins, VP of xHamster, says the company doesn’t have a
specific policy for deepfakes but “treat it like any other
non-consensual content.” Hawkins says that the company’s moderation
process involves multiple different steps and it will remove videos
if people’s images are used without permission.
“We absolutely understand the concern around deepfakes, so we
make it easy for it to be removed,” Hawkins says. “Content uploaded
without necessary permission being obtained is in violation of our
Terms of Use and will be removed once identified.” Hawkins adds
that the dozens of videos appearing as deepfakes on xHamster, which
were highlighted by WIRED, have been passed onto its moderation
team to be reviewed.
Deepfake upload figures seen WIRED did not include Pornhub,
which is the second biggest porn website and despite banning
deepfakes in 2018 still has problems with the videos.
“There has to be some kind of thinking about what we do about
this when women are embarrassed and humiliated and demeaned in this
way on the internet, and it really is like a question about privacy
and security,” says Nina Schick, a political broadcaster and the
author of Deepfakes and the Infocalypse.
Since the first deepfakes emerged from Reddit in early 2018, the
underlying artificial intelligence technology needed to make them
has advanced. It’s getting cheaper and easier for people to make
deepfake videos and in one recent example a security researcher
created video and audio of Tom Hanks using open-source software and
spending less than $100.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
The tech advancements have led to increased fears around
deepfakes being used to manipulate political conversations. While
there have been some early examples of this happening the threat
has largely failed to materialise. However, deepfake porn, where
the technology was first invented, has flourished. Hollywood
actress Kristen Bell said she was “shocked” when she first found
out deepfakes were made using her image. “‘Even if it’s labelled
as, ‘Oh, this is not actually her’ it’s hard to think about that,
I’m being exploited”, she told Vox in June. Deepfakes are already
breaking democracy. Just ask any woman
Privacy Deepfakes are already breaking democracy. Just ask any
woman
The amount of deepfakes online is growing exponentially. A
report from Sensity released last year found 14,678 deepfake videos
online in July 2019 – 96 per cent of these were porn and almost all
are focussed on women. By June this year the amount of deepfakes
had climbed to 49,081.
The majority of deepfake porn is found on, and created by,
specific communities. The top four deepfake porn websites had
received more than 134 million views last year, Sensity’s 2019
analysis shows. One deepfake porn website is full of videos
featuring celebrities and contains videos of Indian actresses that
have been watched millions of times. Some videos state they were
requested, while their creators say they can be paid in
Bitcoin.
“Some of this technology is improving so fast, because there’s
so much energy and drive, unfortunately, from the creators’ side,”
Patrini says. “I think we’re going to be seeing it applied very
soon with much larger intent to private individuals.” He believes
when the technology is easy for anyone to use there will be a
“tipping point” when lawmakers will become aware of the
problems.
Clare McGlynn, a professor at the Durham Law School who
specialises in pornography regulations and sexual abuse images,
agrees. “What this shows is the looming problem that is going to
come for non-celebrities,” she says. “This is a serious issue for
celebrities and others in the public eye. But my long-standing
concern, speaking to individual survivors who are non-celebrities,
is the risk of this is what is coming down the line.”
At the moment, the legal options for people featured in deepfake
videos has not kept up with the technology. In fact, it wasn’t ever
prepared for the impact of AI-generated porn. “If a pornographic
picture or video of you goes up online, your legal options for
taking it down vary wildly,” says Aislinn O’Connell, a law lecturer
from Royal Holloway University in London.
People can pursue non-consensual uploads for defamation, under
human rights laws, copyright complaints and other forms. However,
most of these processes are onerous, resource-intensive and most
often don’t apply to deepfakes. “We need more and better solutions
now,” O’Connell says.
Some deepfake laws have been passed in US states but these
largely focus on politics and ignore the impact that deepfakes are
already having on people’s lives. In the UK the Law Commission is
conducting a review into the sharing on intimate images online,
which includes deepfakes, but it is expected to take years until
any changes can be made. O’Connell proposes that England adopts
image rights laws so people can properly protect themselves.
However, while lawmakers fail to deal with the problem the
technology is set to become cheaper and easier for all to use. “I
see the evolution of deep fakes in the pornographic space as
actually the harbinger of the bigger civil liberties issues that
are going to emerge,” Schick says.
“This technology is out there and it is evolving at a rate that
is much faster than society can keep up with,” she adds. “We are
not ready for the age of synthetic media where even video becomes
something that almost anybody can corrupt”. To fight this, Schick
says, multiple people need to be involved – technologists, the
public, domain specific experts, policy officials, and lawmakers.
Right now, however, that’s not happening.